Before, I read a book for pure enjoyment. I would like and dislike things, but I wouldn't stop and think about them or discuss them. I would like characters and I would dislike writing or feel neutral about a plot, but I wouldn't falter in my reading or criticize it to any real extent.
I do now.
When I read, I pay attention to phrasing and setting and background characters and family situations and loopholes and world building. I talk about themes and write about writing and research authors. I go in-depth.
I don't know if this stems more from reviewing or more from writing, but it's a definite change. And I think it's both a positive and negative one. So I'm gonna go Rory Gilmore on you and make a pro-con list.
Pro: I think reading critically makes me a better writer. When I discuss and form thoughts about what I like and dislike about something I read, I can deliberately embody those thoughts into my writing.
Con: Reading critically might be less fun. Instead of reading just to read, I'll always think "what if this happens" or "what if that happened" or "this scene would be better if..." or "that character should die a horrible death", etc. I never thought I'd say there'd be a time for too many thoughts, but this might be the case with some of the books I read/discuss/overthink.
But I'm glad I read more critically. I may not enjoy as many books, but I know the ones I do enjoy are for good reasons.
So what do you think? Do you read more critically than you did years ago?




